Joyce Khaminwa Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 768 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1999 to 2025; busiest year 2004 (118 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (14); Appeal allowed (7)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (9); Affirmed (4); Appeal dismissed with costs (2); Application dismissed (2)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (4); Application dismissed with costs (3); Defendant's application dismissed (2); Appeal granted (2)
- Civil Suit: Dismissed with costs (4); Application dismissed (3); Application dismissed with costs (3); Appeal dismissed (2)
- Appeal: Affirmed (2); Appeal dismissed (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (15)
- Criminal Procedure Code (11)
- Civil Procedure Rules (11)
- Penal Code (8)
- Law Reform Act (5)
- Customs & Excise Act (4)
- Civil Procedure Act, Cap.21 (4)
- Advocates Act (4)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from original conviction and sentence (49), Appeal from conviction and sentence (39), Appeal from Original Conviction and Sentence (19)
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 6/57, In favor of the plaintiff: 4/57, Application dismissed: 4/57, Dismissed: 3/57
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 80/232, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 19/232, Appeal allowed: 11/232, Appeal successful: 6/232
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — Dismissed with costs: 3/23, Judgment in favor of the applicant: 2/23, The application is allowed.: 2/23, The application for judicial review is granted.: 1/23
- [civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 2/7, Judgment entered for Plaintiff in the sum of Shs.573,400/- plus costs and interest at court rates.: 1/7, plaintiff wins: 1/7, The court upholds the judgment of the Resident Magistrate and orders the appellant to pay the respondent Shs.112,500/= plus interest and costs.: 1/7
- [Bail Application] outcomes — Bail granted: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~4662 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set appellant at liberty (5)
- Damages awarded to the plaintiff (3)
- Costs to the respondent (3)
- Set aside conviction and sentence (3)
- Set the appellant at liberty (2)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.4
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (71), Civil Procedure Act (23), Criminal Procedure Code (20), Succession Act (12), Registered Land Act Cap. 300 (11)
Sample decisions
RACHEL MOHAMED v FLORENCE FURAHA MKADI & 2 OTHERS [1999] KEHC 59 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1999] KEHC 59 (KLR) · 1 December 1999
RASHID SALIM vs REPUBLIC [2000] KEHC 103 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 103 (KLR) · 20 December 2000
Republic v Commissioner of Lands & another Ex- Parte Coastal Aquaculture Ltd [2000] KEHC 539 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 539 (KLR) · 17 November 2000
Rashid Salim v Republic [2000] KEHC 74 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 74 (KLR) · 20 December 2000
CHOMBO NZOLE vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 230 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 230 (KLR) · 13 September 2001
MATU FONDO KALAMA vs - REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 265 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 265 (KLR) · 30 August 2001
GABRIEL KARANI MWAZAME vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 267 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 267 (KLR)
JAMES KINYWA NKOROI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 273 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 273 (KLR) · 6 December 2001
AYONS MBAAZI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 275 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 275 (KLR) · 29 August 2001
Daniel Wambua Muteleli v Republic [2001] KEHC 279 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 279 (KLR) · 8 October 2001