Lilian Mutende Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 18 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2012 to 2016; busiest year 2012 (17 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Suit: In favor of the Plaintiff (1); The application was dismissed. (1); Granted (1)
- Bail Hearing: Granted (1)
- Criminal Revision: Sentence set aside, accused released (1); The application for revision is dismissed. (1); The case is transferred to Kericho Law Courts (1); The order denying bail is set aside. (1)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, sentence set aside, appe (1)
- Miscellaneous Application: Quashed (1); The application for certiorari is granted, and the order of (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (4)
- Criminal Procedure Code (3)
- Civil Procedure Rules (3)
- Penal Code (2)
- Article 49(h) of the Constitution (1)
- Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75 (K) (1)
- Matrimonial Causes Rules (1)
- Motor Vehicle Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for Bail (2), Appeal from a lower court decision (2), Applicant seeks revision of sentence imposed by the trial Magistrate (1)
- [Bail Hearing] outcomes — Granted: 1/1
- [Criminal Revision] outcomes — Sentence set aside, accused released: 1/4, The application for revision is dismissed.: 1/4, The case is transferred to Kericho Law Courts: 1/4, The order denying bail is set aside.: 1/4
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — The application was dismissed.: 1/3, Granted: 1/3, In favor of the Plaintiff: 1/3
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, sentence set aside, appellant released: 1/1
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — Quashed: 1/2, The application for certiorari is granted, and the order of the Sigor Land Disputes Tribunal dated 29th July 2011 is quashed.: 1/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~6557 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Injunctions (1)
- Costs of the suit (1)
- Withdrawal of funds for educational purposes (1)
- Quashing of the order of the Sigor Land Disputes Tribunal (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Act (4), Criminal Procedure Code (3), Civil Procedure Rules (3), Penal Code (2), Article 49(h) of the Constitution (1)
Sample decisions
REPUBLIC V CHRISTOPHER KIPKOSGEI MUTAI [2012] KEHC 472 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 472 (KLR) · 13 November 2012
WELDON KIPRONO NGENO v REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 550 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 550 (KLR)
EUNICE AKINYI v REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 560 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 560 (KLR)
SAMWEL MUDAVADI V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 724 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 724 (KLR)
RAELI CHEPNGETICH CHEBELYON V ELIJAH CHERUIYOT CHEBELYON [2012] KEHC 742 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 742 (KLR) · 7 November 2012
HARON KIPKURUI CHERUIYOT V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 759 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 759 (KLR)
KIKWAI A. MAGERER V CHAIRMAN BOMET LDT & 2 OTHERS [2012] KEHC 795 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 795 (KLR) · 28 November 2012
REPUBLIC V DAVID KIPLANGAT TONUI [2012] KEHC 802 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 802 (KLR) · 13 November 2012
REPUBLIC V STEPHEN KIPRONO TONUI [2012] KEHC 803 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 803 (KLR)
REPUBLIC V LAWRENCE GITAU GATHUKA & ANOTHER [2012] KEHC 804 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 804 (KLR) · 22 November 2012