SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Belcom Agencies Limited v Transline Classic Limited [2021] KEBPRT 232 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 232 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
232
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 232 (KLR)
Decided
21 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureApplication for Order to Levy Distress and DeclarationCoramHON. P. MAY, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISE RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The Tribunal's application to levy distress is disallowed with costs to the Tenant.

Facts

Belcom Agencies Limited (Landlord) applied for an order to levy distress against Transline Classic Limited (Tenant) for rent arrears of KSh 10,080,000. The Tenant claimed they had always paid rent as it fell due and had granted an advance loan to the Landlord.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to order for the levy of distress against a tenant in rent arrears
  2. Validity of the Landlord's application to levy distress

Reasoning

The Tribunal ruled that the Landlord did not have the authority to levy distress as the Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited by the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, hotels and catering establishments) Act, Cap. 301. The Tribunal also found that the Landlord had not obtained the consent of the Tribunal before levying distress.

Outcome

Disallowed

Orders

  • Costs to be provided for the Tenant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, hotels and catering establishments) Act, Cap. 301
  • Distress for Rent Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel‘Lillian S’ Vs Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited [1989] eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 others [2012] eKLR
  • Owayo vs. George Hannington Zephaniah Aduda t/a Aduda Auctioneers and another (2007) 2 KLR 140, (2008) EA 287
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case