Kingara v Ikandi (Tribunal Case Miscellaneous E254 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 223 (KLR) (Civ) (15 July 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Case number
- 223
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 223 (KLR)
- Decided
- 15 July 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Rent TribunalPostureApplication dismissed with no orders as to costsCoramHON. P. MAY, VICE CHAIR
Holding
The application is dismissed with no orders as to costs
Facts
The tenant, Paul Kingara, applied for an order to reconnect power supply, alleging the landlord, Mary Mumo Ikandi, had disconnected it. The landlord denied disconnection and stated the tenant had refused to vacate the premises.
Issues
- Whether the application has merit
- Whether to grant a prayer for suspension of rent
Reasoning
The Tribunal found the landlord had not disconnected the power supply and the issue had been overtaken by events. The Tribunal declined to grant the prayer for suspension of rent due to the provisions of article 40 of the Constitution.
Outcome
Application dismissed
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Cap 301
- Article 40 of the Constitution
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…