SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muthoni v Jowi (Tribunal Case E103 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 883 (KLR) (Civ) (29 December 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 883 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
883
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 883 (KLR)
Decided
29 December 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEviction CasePostureTenant's Motion for Restraining Orders Against LandlordCoramGAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR
Holding

The landlord's notice to terminate tenancy is void due to failure to comply with section 4 of Cap 301, Laws of Kenya.

Facts

Tenant Emily Muthoni filed a motion for restraining orders against the landlord Isdora Jowi, claiming the landlord was threatening to illegally evict her from the business premises. The landlord issued a defective notice to vacate the premises on July 27, 2022, requiring the tenant to vacate by August 3, 2022, due to a leaking roof.

Issues

  1. Tenant's claim of illegal eviction
  2. Validity of landlord's notice

Reasoning

The notice was found to be defective and not in compliance with the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301, Laws of Kenya.

Outcome

The landlord is restrained from interfering with the tenant's occupation and use of the business premises.

Orders

  • The landlord's notice to terminate tenancy is void
  • The landlord is restrained from interfering with the tenant's occupation and use of the business premises
  • The landlord is granted leave to serve a proper notice under the said Act
  • The landlord shall pay costs of Kshs 20,000/- to be deducted from rent if not paid within 14 days to the Tenant

Remedies

  • Restraining orders against the landlord

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301, Laws of Kenya
  • Public Health Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case