SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gikuya v Administrators of the Estate of Erastus Njugua Kama (Deceased) & another (Tribunal Case E108 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 681 (KLR) (Civ) (7 September 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 681 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
681
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 681 (KLR)
Decided
7 September 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for restraining orders and declaration of invalidity of rent increment noticeCoramGAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR
Holding

The notice to increase rent is declared invalid and the tenant is restrained from eviction or interference with the tenancy.

Facts

The tenant, Gikuya, sought to restrain the landlords from enforcing a rent increment notice issued by Splendor Commercial Agencies, which increased the rent from Kshs.15,000 to Kshs.50,000 per month, effective January 1, 2022. The tenant claimed the increment was arbitrary and threatened eviction if the increased rent was not paid.

Issues

  1. Whether the notice to increase rent complies with provisions of Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
  2. Whether the tenant is entitled to the reliefs sought in the reference and application dated January 31, 2021
  3. Who is liable to pay costs

Reasoning

The notice was not in the prescribed form and was not compliant with the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya. The tenant was exposed to an illegality and was entitled to seek protection from the Tribunal.

Outcome

The tenant's reference and application are allowed, and the landlord is restrained from enforcing the rent increment notice.

Orders

  • The tenant is restrained from eviction or interference with the tenancy.
  • The landlord's notice to increase rent is declared invalid and set aside.
  • The landlord is at liberty to issue a proper notice.
  • Costs of the case assessed at Kshs.20,000/- are awarded to the tenant against the Respondents.

Remedies

  • Restraining orders against eviction or interference with the tenancy

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Syedna Mohamed Burhannudin Saheb – vs- Mohammedally Hassanally (1980) eKLR
  • Kirima Bus Services Ltd – vs- Joseph Kariuki Gichimu t/a Tausi Enterprises and Peacock Enterprises (2013) eKLR
  • Aikman – vs- Muchoki (1982) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case