SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Eun-Tex Garments Traders & another v Mwangi (Sued as The Legal Representative of The Estate of Laban Kingori Macharia) & 4 others (Tribunal Case E599, E152 & E807 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2022] KEBPRT 247 (KLR) (Civ) (15 July 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 247 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
247
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 247 (KLR)
Decided
15 July 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramGAKUHI CHEGE
Holding

The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents are entitled to the rental income from the business premises. The 4th and 5th Respondents are not entitled to the rental income. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents shall pay costs of Kshs 75,000/- to the Applicants.

Facts

Eun-Tex Garments Traders and Marina Fashions are tenants of the business premises on LR NO 209/1413/28, Accra Road, Nairobi. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents are the executors of the estate of John Mwangi Kingori, while the 4th and 5th Respondents are the administrators of the estate of John Mwangi Kingori. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents claimed the rental income from the premises, while the 4th and 5th Respondents claimed it belonged to the estate of Laban Kingori Macharia.

Issues

  1. Who is entitled to the rental income from the business premises
  2. Whether the applicants/respondents are entitled to the reliefs sought in their applications and references
  3. Who is liable to pay costs of the consolidated suit

Reasoning

The court found that the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents are the executors of the estate of John Mwangi Kingori and thus entitled to the rental income. The 4th and 5th Respondents are the administrators of the estate of John Mwangi Kingori and not entitled to the rental income.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents are entitled to the rental income from the business premises
  • The 4th and 5th Respondents are not entitled to the rental income
  • The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Respondents shall pay costs of Kshs 75,000/- to the Applicants

Remedies

  • Costs of Kshs 75,000/- to the Applicants
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case