SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Board of Directors of Divine Word Boys High School v Katani Medical Centre (Tribunal Case E263 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 682 (KLR) (5 September 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 682 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
682
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 682 (KLR)
Decided
5 September 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureReference and Application for Termination of TenancyCoramGAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR
Holding

The landlord has failed to prove service of notice to terminate tenancy, thus is not entitled to the reliefs sought.

Facts

The landlord sought to terminate the tenant's tenancy due to expansion plans, but the tenant denied receiving any notice. The landlord provided a notice dated 1st June 2021, but it was not in the prescribed form and not uploaded on the CTS Portal.

Issues

  1. Whether the landlord served notice to terminate tenancy under section 4 of Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya.
  2. Whether the landlord is entitled to the reliefs sought in the reference and application dated 14th March 2022.
  3. Who is liable to pay costs.

Reasoning

The landlord's notice was not in the prescribed form and not uploaded on the CTS Portal, making it defective. The tenant denied receiving any notice, and the landlord failed to prove service.

Outcome

The landlord's reference and application dated 14th March 2022 is hereby dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The landlord's reference and application dated 14th March 2022 is hereby dismissed with costs.
  • The tenant's costs against the landlord is assessed in the sum of Kshs.25,000/- all inclusive to be defrayed against rent account if not paid within Thirty (30) days hereof.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
  • Cap. 80, Evidence Act
  • Land Act, 2012
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case