Sankale v Karasha (Tribunal Case E415 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 717 (KLR) (16 September 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Case number
- 717
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 717 (KLR)
- Decided
- 16 September 2022
The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the applicant has not shown a prima facie case and that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to stay or suspend the proceedings.
Facts
Alfred Karasha Sankale, the applicant, filed a reference against Simon Joseph Karasha, the respondent, seeking restraining orders and a temporary injunction against eviction from the suit premises Laiser Farmers Bar and Restaurant. The applicant claims he is the rightful owner of the premises and has moved the court of appeal to declare him so. The respondent contends he is the registered proprietor and has terminated the tenancy.
Issues
- Whether the applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought in the application dated 16th May 2022.
- Who is liable to pay costs.
Reasoning
The Tribunal applied the principles for issuance of a temporary injunction, stating that the applicant must show a prima facie case with a probability of success and that an injunction will not normally be granted unless the applicant might otherwise suffer irreparable injury. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant has not shown a prima facie case.
Outcome
The application was dismissed.
Authorities cited
Cases cited (1)
- Locus Classicus case of Giella vs Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd (1973) EA 358
Loading judgment…