SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wakaimba v Thuku (Tribunal Case E059 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 847 (KLR) (Civ) (22 November 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 847 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
847
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 847 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureAppeal from a lower tribunal rulingCoramHON A. MUMA, Vice Chair
Holding

The notice issued by the landlord is declared valid.

Facts

The landlord and tenant entered into a lease agreement for five years. The tenant defaulted on rent payments, leading to a notice to terminate the tenancy issued by the landlord. The tenant did not respond, and the landlord filed a notice of motion application.

Issues

  1. Whether the notice issued by the landlord was valid?
  2. Whether there are any arrears owed to the landlord?

Reasoning

The notice was issued in accordance with the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, requiring a notice of at least two months before taking effect.

Outcome

The landlord's application is allowed.

Orders

  • The notice issued by the landlord is declared valid.
  • The tenant shall grant the landlord vacant possession of the premises within the next 30 days.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.

Remedies

  • Declaration of the notice's validity.
  • Tenant's obligation to vacate the premises.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Chapter 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case