SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wangatho v Gachecheh (Tribunal Case 61 of 2020) [2022] KEBPRT 857 (KLR) (Civ) (8 November 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEBPRT 857 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
857
Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 857 (KLR)
Decided
8 November 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramA MUMA, VICE CHAIR
Holding

There exists a tenancy relationship between the landlord and the tenant, and the notice to terminate is valid.

Facts

The tenant and landlord entered into a tenancy agreement on December 17, 2013, which expired in January 2020. The tenant has been paying rent since the lease expired, and the landlord issued a notice to terminate the tenancy without a proper notice.

Issues

  1. Whether there exists a tenancy relationship between the landlord and the tenant.
  2. Whether the notice to terminate is valid.

Reasoning

The tribunal found that the tenant has been paying rent since the lease expired, establishing a controlled tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment) Act. The notice to terminate was valid as it was issued after the lease expired.

Outcome

Affirming the landlord's notice to terminate the tenancy

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment) Act cap 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case