Mire v Tawakal Money Transfer Ltd & 56 others (Tribunal Case E936 of 2022) [2022] KEBPRT 867 (KLR) (20 December 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Case number
- 867
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 867 (KLR)
- Decided
- 20 December 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureApplicant's Reference UpheldCoramA. Muma
Holding
The landlord's notice to terminate the tenancy was valid, and the tenant is required to grant vacant possession of the premises.
Facts
The landlord issued a notice to terminate the tenancy on June 2, 2022, which was to take effect on August 6, 2022. The tenant opposed the notice and filed applications to oppose the notices issued by the landlord.
Issues
- Whether the termination notice issued by the landlord was valid?
- Whether the tenant's opposition to the notice was valid.
Reasoning
The notice was issued within the required two-month period, and the tenant did not oppose it.
Outcome
The landlord's references are upheld, and the notices are declared valid.
Orders
- The landlord's references dated October 14, 2022 is upheld.
- The notices issued by the landlord dated June 2, 2022 are declared valid.
- The tenant shall grant the landlord vacant possession of the premises.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Chapter 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…