Said & another v Timiro (Tribunal Case E118 of 2021) [2022] KEBPRT 884 (KLR) (Civ) (18 October 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Case number
- 884
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 884 (KLR)
- Decided
- 18 October 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the Business Premises Rent TribunalCoramGAKUHI CHEGE, Hassan, Mwawasaa, Abdulahi
Holding
The tenancy was terminated effective October 1, 2021, and the landlords are entitled to possession of the premises. The tenant is ordered to pay kshs.30,000/- as costs to the landlords.
Facts
The landlords filed a reference seeking a declaration that the tenancy with the tenant was terminated effective October 1, 2021, and an order for possession of the premises. The tenant was accused of being irregular in rent payment and persistent default, leading to a notice of termination dated July 15, 2021. The tenant did not file a reference in opposition to the notice.
Issues
- Termination of tenancy
- Possession of premises
- Costs
Reasoning
The notice of termination was issued due to the tenant's persistent default in rent payment, and the tenant did not file a reference in opposition to the notice.
Outcome
Affirmed
Orders
- The tenant shall pay kshs.30,000/- as costs to the landlords.
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Cap 301, Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…