SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Themes Restaurant v Ijara Properties & 2 others (Tribunal Case E949 of 2022) [2023] KEBPRT 202 (KLR) (Civ) (27 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEBPRT 202 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
202
Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 202 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramHON A. MUMA, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The landlord did not follow due procedure in seeking to levy distress, and the tenant was in arrears and should be held accountable.

Facts

The tenant, Themes Restaurant, filed a reference and application before the Tribunal seeking to restrain the landlord, Ijara Properties, from carrying away or disposing of their goods after being issued with a Proclamation Notice for defaulting in paying rent. The landlord subsequently filed an application for leave to levy distress for rent.

Issues

  1. Whether the tenant is in arrears of rent warranting distress
  2. Whether the landlord followed due procedure in seeking to levy distress

Reasoning

The landlord failed to seek leave of the Tribunal prior to issuing the Proclamation Notice, which is required by CAP 301, Section 12(h). The tenant was found to be in arrears and should be held accountable.

Outcome

The tenant's reference and application are partially allowed, with the landlord granted the right to distress and apply for eviction orders in the event of default.

Orders

  • The tenant shall pay Kshs. 200,000.00 per month from 5th April 2023 till payment in full of the arrears, being rent of Kshs. 120,000.00 and Kshs. 80,000.00 for arrears.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.

Remedies

  • Restraining orders against the landlord

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • CAP 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case