SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Thuita v Njeri (Tribunal Case E726 of 2022) [2023] KEBPRT 37 (KLR) (30 January 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEBPRT 37 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
37
Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 37 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureTenant v LandlordCoramGAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR
Holding

The landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy is dismissed, and the tenant is ordered to give up possession of the suit premises.

Facts

The landlord issued a notice to terminate the tenant's tenancy over plot no. B2, Kayole, with effect from 1st September 2022, citing personal reasons for not less than one year. The tenant opposed the notice and filed a reference, contesting the reason for termination and the landlord's intention to use the premises for personal reasons.

Issues

  1. Whether the landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy ought to be approved or dismissed.
  2. Who is liable to pay costs of the reference.

Reasoning

The court finds that the landlord's notice was not genuinely issued for personal reasons but rather to evict the tenant for refusing to increase rent. The landlord's intention to use the premises for personal business is not genuine, and the notice was precipitated by the tenant's refusal to increase rent.

Outcome

The landlord's notice to terminate tenancy is dismissed.

Orders

  • The landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy is dismissed.
  • The tenant is ordered to give up possession of the suit premises.

Remedies

  • The tenant is ordered to give up possession of the suit premises.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
  • Section 4(2) of Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
  • Section 7(1) (g) of Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Kasturi Limited v Nyeri Wholesalers Limited (2014) eKLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd (1973) EA 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case