SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sax and Violin Limited v Cross Roads Limited (Tribunal Case E238 of 2023) [2023] KEBPRT 644 (KLR) (27 October 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEBPRT 644 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
644
Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 644 (KLR)
Decided
27 October 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for Reference and Application to Levy Distress for RentCoramA. Muma
Holding

The Tribunal has the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter. The landlord has the right to distress for rent arrears.

Facts

The tenant, Sax and Violin Limited, rented business premises from the landlord, Cross Roads Limited. The tenant owed rent arrears and the landlord issued a Proclamation Notice for distress. The tenant filed a Reference and Application to the Business Premises Rent Tribunal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tribunal has the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter.
  2. Whether the Proclamation Notice by the 2nd respondent is legal.

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that there was no written lease agreement, leading to a periodic tenancy agreement. The landlord has the right to distress for rent arrears, and the tenant was given an opportunity to pay in installments.

Outcome

The Reference and Application are partially allowed.

Orders

  • Tenant to pay rent and arrears in the sum of KShs. 1,500,000.00 per month on or before the 5th day of every month.
  • Costs of this Reference assessed at KShs. 50,000/= awarded to the Landlord.

Remedies

  • Allowance of the tenant's request to pay rent in installments.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenants (Hotels, Shops and Catering Establishments) Act cap 301
  • Distress for Rent Act, cap. 293
Cases cited (2)
  • John Nthumbi Kamwithi v Asha Akumu Juma (2018) eKLR
  • Peter Nthenge v Daniel Itumo & another HCCC No. 1242 of 1974
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case