SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njeru v Gichunge (Tribunal Case E036 of 2023) [2023] KEBPRT 691 (KLR) (1 December 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEBPRT 691 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
691
Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 691 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureTenant's Application dismissedCoramP. Kitur
Holding

The Tenant's Application is dismissed. The Tenant is ordered to clear arrears of Kshs. 100,000 as at August 2023 by December 31, 2023, or the Landlord may distress for rent.

Facts

The Tenant avers that the Landlord locked the business premises with trading goods inside on June 5, 2023, halting the business. The Tenant claims to have paid rent dutifully, but the Landlord states the Tenant has not paid rent for May and August 2023.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tenant/Applicant is entitled to the orders sought.

Reasoning

The Tenant failed to prove payment of rent and the Landlord's claim was not refuted. The Tenant's claim for loss when the premises were closed was not proven.

Outcome

Tenant's Application dismissed

Orders

  • Tenant to clear arrears of Kshs. 100,000 by December 31, 2023
  • Landlord to distress for rent if arrears not cleared
  • Mention on 15th January 2024 for directions on Complaint and pending Application
  • Each party to bear their own costs

Remedies

  • Clearing arrears of Kshs. 100,000 by December 31, 2023
  • Distress for rent if arrears not cleared

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Evidence Act
  • Landlords and Tenants (Shops, Hotels and Catering) Establishments Act Cap 301
Cases cited (1)
  • Muriungi Kanoru Jeremiah vs Stephen Ungu M’mwarabua [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case