SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ROSE NYABOKE OTONDI vs TOM MURUNGA [1998] KECA 120 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 120 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
120
Citation
[1998] KECA 120 (KLR)
Decided
17 July 1998
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication to strike out the Notice of Appeal and the Record of Appeal
Holding

The court grants the applicant leave to file a record of appeal out of time, but not a notice of appeal out of time.

Facts

Rose Nyaboke Otondi sued Tom Murunga over a traffic accident in which her husband was killed. The case proceeded ex parte, and the High Court awarded damages to Otondi. Murunga filed an application to set aside the judgment, which was denied. He then filed a notice of appeal, which was later withdrawn. Murunga filed another motion seeking a stay of the judgment, which was wrongly marked as a record of appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to file a notice of appeal out of time
  2. Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to file a record of appeal out of time

Reasoning

The court finds that a notice of appeal was filed within time, but the record of appeal was not filed within time due to the applicant's mistake. The court grants leave to file the record of appeal out of time but not the notice of appeal.

Outcome

The court grants the applicant leave to file a record of appeal out of time but not a notice of appeal out of time.

Orders

  • The applicant is given leave to file a record of appeal out of time and must file it within 21 days of this ruling.
  • The applicant shall pay the respondent the costs of this motion in any event.

Remedies

  • Leave to file a record of appeal out of time
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case