VICTORIA K. WILLS vs BURKHARD KOARTIS [2002] KECA 169 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 169
- Citation
- [2002] KECA 169 (KLR)
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication to strike out a notice of appealCoramJ. E. GICHERU, A. A. LAKHA, E. O'KUBASU
Holding
The notice of appeal is struck out with costs including the costs of the motion.
Facts
The respondent filed a notice of appeal on 14th September, 1999, but no appeal was filed within the prescribed time. An application for an extension was made but not exhibited.
Issues
- Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out due to non-filing of appeal within the prescribed time
- Whether the application for an extension should be considered
Reasoning
The court found that no appeal was filed within the prescribed time and that an application for an extension was not exhibited. The court was not persuaded that there was any reason why the notice of appeal should not be struck out.
Outcome
The notice of appeal is struck out with costs.
Orders
- The notice of appeal filed on 14th September, 1999 is struck out with costs including the costs of the motion.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…