SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Charles Nyamanga v Teachers Service Commission [2022] KEELRC 623 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 623 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
623
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 623 (KLR)
Decided
25 February 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Trial Court's dismissal of a claim under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007CoramJames Rika
Holding

The appeal is dismissed. The court finds that the trial court did not err in dismissing the claim on limitation of time, as the claim was filed out of time and the court cannot extend the prescribed period.

Facts

The claimant filed a claim out of time, and the trial court dismissed it as time-barred. The claimant appealed, citing several grounds including the trial court's failure to consider his internal appeal with the respondent's commission.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the claim on limitation of time.
  2. Whether the trial court considered the appellant's submissions and authorities.
  3. Whether the trial court demonstrated open bias against the appellant.
  4. Whether the trial court appreciated the appellant's internal appeal with the respondent's commission.
  5. Whether the trial court misapprehended Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Reasoning

The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the claim was filed out of time and that the court cannot extend the prescribed period to create a jurisdiction it does not have. The court also noted that the appellant did not file an ex parte application for extension of time.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • Costs to the respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Rift Valley Railways [Kenya] Limited v. Hawkins Wagunza Musonye & Another [2016] e-KLR
Cases cited (1)
  • Rift Valley Railways [Kenya] Limited v. Hawkins Wagunza Musonye & Another [2016] e-KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case