SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Areva T & D India Limited v Priority Electrical Engineers Limited & another [2009] KECA 27 (KLR)

[2009] KECA 27 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
27
Citation
[2009] KECA 27 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2009
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of an intended appealCoramS. E. O. BOSIRE, E. O. O’KUBASU, ALNASHIR VISRAM
Holding

The court grants the stay of the proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal

Facts

The applicant, Areva T & D India Limited, was awarded a contract by Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd. to reinforce and upgrade the electricity distribution network. PEE, Priority Electrical Engineers Limited, filed a lawsuit against the applicant, seeking an injunction to prevent the applicant from awarding the sub-contract to Empower Installation Contractors Ltd.

Issues

  1. Whether the superior court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit
  2. Whether the superior court's order on the venue of the arbitral proceedings was correct

Reasoning

The court agrees with the applicant that the superior court's jurisdiction to entertain the suit is arguable, and that the intended appeal is arguable. The court also finds that the applicant will be compelled to enter into an arbitration in a manner not contemplated in its agreement with PEE, and in violation of the agreement.

Outcome

The court grants the stay of the proceedings

Orders

  • Stay of the proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Section 6 (1) of the Arbitration Act
  • Rule 2 of the Arbitration Rules 1997
  • Shashi C. Patel vs. Damayanti Narin Shah and Another – Civil Application No. Nai. 236 of 2006 (UR. 131/2006)
  • The Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillians” vs. Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd. [1998] KRL 1
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case