SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gachuhi & another v Evangelical Mission for Africa & another; Law Society of Kenya (Interested Party) (Civil Appeal 159 of 2015) [2023] KECA 51 (KLR) (3 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 51 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
51
Citation
[2023] KECA 51 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court ruling and ordersCoramAs Burrough, E. K. Ogola, M'INOTI, Ogola, Ringera
Holding

The High Court's ruling and orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.

Facts

In 2005, the respondents expressed interest in purchasing a portion of land known as LR No 2951/84. The appellants were offering to sell the land through Kaplan & Stratton Advocates. The respondents filed an application to set aside the arbitration award, while the appellants sought to strike out the respondents' application.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court to set aside an arbitration award
  2. Interpretation of the Arbitration Act and Constitution
  3. Interference with the arbitration process

Reasoning

The Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by delving into the merits of the dispute and accepting new evidence. It also found that the court was exercising jurisdiction beyond what is granted under the Arbitration Act.

Outcome

Appeals allowed

Orders

  • Ruling and orders of the High Court set aside
  • Appeals allowed

Remedies

  • Reconsideration of the case by the High Court

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Arbitration Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • National Cereals & Produce Board v Erad Suppliers & General Contracts Limited
  • Nyutu Agrovet Limited v Airtel Networks Kenya Limited, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators-Kenya Branch (Interested Party)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case