SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Omundi v Republic (Criminal Appeal 327 of 2018) [2023] KECA 1557 (KLR) (19 December 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 1557 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1557
Citation
[2023] KECA 1557 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at NyamiraCoramH. A. OMONDI, JOEL NGUGI
Holding

The judgment of the first appellate court is set aside, and the appeal is remanded back to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal by a High Court Judge other than C.B. Nagillah, J.

Facts

The appellant, Edwin Osoro Omundi, was charged with delement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. He pleaded not guilty and the prosecution called five witnesses to prove its case.

Issues

  1. Was there penetration into the complainant's vagina?

Reasoning

The first appellate court failed to re-evaluate the evidence as required by law, and the judgment was a nullity. The court agreed with the respondent that the proper recourse is to remand the appeal for a re-hearing by a judge other than the one who heard it in the first place.

Outcome

Appeal succeeds to the limited extent of remanding the case to the High Court.

Orders

  • Remand the appeal back to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal by a High Court Judge other than C.B. Nagillah, J.
  • Set aside the judgment dated 28th April, 2017 of C.B. Nagillah, J.

Remedies

  • Remand the appeal back to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal by a High Court Judge other than C.B. Nagillah, J.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Criminal Procedure Act
Cases cited (5)
  • Okeno v Republic (1972) EA 32
  • Pandya v. R (1957) EA 336
  • Ruwala v. R (1957) EA 570
  • Samuel Warui Karimi v. Republic (2016) eKLR
  • Hezron Rioba Achiki v R (Court of Appeal at Kisumu Crim. App. No. 155 of 2017)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case