SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Achiki v Republic (Criminal Appeal 155 of 2017) [2023] KECA 846 (KLR) (7 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECA 846 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
846
Citation
[2023] KECA 846 (KLR)
Decided
7 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from the conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at KisiiCoramP.O. KIAGE, F. TUIYOTT, JOEL NGUGI
Holding

The Court remands the matter back to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal of the first appeal.

Facts

The appellant, Hezron Rioba Achiki, was convicted of grievous harm under section 234 of the Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. The first appeal was dismissed by the High Court at Kisii.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court at Kisii erred in dismissing the first appeal without a proper examination of the evidence.
  2. Whether the second appellate court should hear and determine issues of law only or also matters of fact and law.
  3. Whether the second appellate court should remand the matter for rehearing of the first appeal or not.

Reasoning

The Court found that the first appeal was not properly heard due to the lack of a proper examination of the evidence and that the second appellate court should only hear and determine issues of law. The long period already served by the appellant and the seriousness of the offence were considered in deciding to remand the matter.

Outcome

Remand of the first appeal to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal.

Orders

  • Remand the first appeal to the High Court for accelerated hearing and disposal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Penal Code
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case