SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bichage v Tongi & 2 others (Civil Application 39 of 2013) [2013] KECA 141 (KLR) (22 November 2013) (Ruling)

[2013] KECA 141 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
141
Citation
[2013] KECA 141 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from the High Court's judgment in an election petitionCoramF. AZANGALALA, J.W. ONYANGO OTIENO, S. ole KANTAI
Holding

The court has jurisdiction to entertain the application and grants a stay of the proceedings to preserve the subject matter till the appeal is fully heard and determined within six months.

Facts

Presidential, Gubernatorial, Senatorial, Parliamentary elections were held in Kenya. The applicant was one of the candidates for the Parliamentary elections in Nyaribari Chache Constituency. The Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission appointed the third respondent as the Returning Officer.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for stay of execution pending appeal
  2. Whether the court should grant a stay of the proceedings to preserve the subject matter till the appeal is fully heard and determined

Reasoning

The court concludes that the application was brought pursuant to Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal's Rules and that it has a duty to hear applications directly connected to the appeal. The court grants a stay of the proceedings to prevent the appeal from being rendered nugatory.

Outcome

The court grants a stay of the proceedings pending the appeal.

Orders

  • Grant a stay of the proceedings pending the appeal

Remedies

  • Preservation of the subject matter till the appeal is fully heard and determined

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Elections Act
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case