SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Samuel Ogodo Waga v Fish Processors (2000) Ltd [2015] KECA 561 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 561 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
561
Citation
[2015] KECA 561 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution from the High Court's ruling and ordersCoramD. K. MARAGA, S. GATEMBU KAIRU, FCIArb, A. K. MURGOR
Holding

The application is dismissed as it is overtaken by the disposal of the appeal.

Facts

The applicant appealed against a decision denying him leave to amend his statement of defence. He then applied to review, vary or set aside the appeal judgment. The High Court dismissed his application for review. The applicant then moved for an order to set aside the taxed bill of costs and for a stay of execution pending appeal. The High Court dismissed this application. The applicant then filed the present application for a stay of execution on any subsequent proceedings until the appeal is heard and determined.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for a stay of execution is relevant and should be granted.
  2. Whether the appeal has been rendered nugatory due to the dismissal of the applicant's application for review.

Reasoning

The powers of the Court under rule 5(2)(b) of the rules of the Court are aimed at maintaining a state of affairs where an applicant makes out an arguable appeal and demonstrates that the intended appeal will be rendered nugatory unless the temporary orders sought are granted. Since the appeal has been heard and determined, there is no basis for the Court to exercise jurisdiction under rule 5(2)(b) of the rules of the Court.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The applicant's application for a stay of execution on any subsequent proceedings until the appeal is heard and determined is dismissed.
  • The respondent shall have the costs of the application.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case