SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Marti Telecommunications Ltd v G4s Security Services (K) Limited [2015] KECA 126 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 126 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
126
Citation
[2015] KECA 126 (KLR)
Decided
18 December 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from an order made by the High Court of KenyaCoramP. M. MWILU, F. AZANGALALA, J. MOHAMMED
Holding

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the High Court to deposit the decretal amount pending the hearing of the application for stay of execution is upheld.

Facts

The appellant, Marti Telecommunications Limited, sued the respondent, G4S Security Services (K) Limited, in the subordinate court for damages for breach of contract. The subordinate court awarded the respondent Kshs.426,816.03. The respondent appealed and the High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the award and substituting a judgment in favour of the appellant for Kshs. 1,000/=. The respondent was awarded the costs of the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court erred in making an order for the deposit of the decretal amount pending the hearing of the application for stay of execution

Reasoning

The court found that the order was intended to preserve the subject matter being the proceeds of the execution pending the hearing of the application, which was lawfully pending hearing and determination before the learned Judge of the High Court.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order for deposit of the decretal amount pending the hearing of the application for stay of execution

Remedies

  • Each party bears its own costs of the appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case