SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour National Social Security and Services v Central Organisation of Trade Unions (K) & 2 others (Civil Application 252 of 2014) [2015] KECA 123 (KLR) (18 December 2015) (Ruling)

[2015] KECA 123 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
123
Citation
[2015] KECA 123 (KLR)
Decided
18 December 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of proceedings pending appealCoramALNASHIR VISRAM, W. KARANJA, H. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs, as the applicant has failed to establish that the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the proceedings are not stayed.

Facts

The Cabinet Secretary of the Ministry of Labour, National Social Security and Services revoked the appointment of the Secretary General of Central Organisation of Trade Unions (K) to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) Board of Trustees. The Secretary General and his nominee moved to the Labour Court seeking orders to quash the decision and restore the appointment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit
  2. Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay of proceedings is not granted

Reasoning

The Court found that the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court is not established, and that the intended appeal would not be rendered nugatory if the proceedings are not stayed.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Order to stay all further proceedings in Nairobi Industrial Cause No. 1213 of 2014 pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case