SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mackenzie Moulding Mogere & another v Trustees of Telposta Pension Scheme & 4 others [2017] KECA 330 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 330 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
330
Citation
[2017] KECA 330 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the decision of the Industrial Court of KenyaCoramP. N. WAKI, R. N. NAMBUYE, P. O. KIAGE
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the decision and orders of the Employment and Labour Relations Court are set aside. The petition is dismissed.

Facts

Mogere and Ndoria, management level employees of Telkom, retired and joined Telposta pension scheme. They objected to the payment of their pension based on the consolidated salary, while Telkom had previously linked their salary to unionizable staff and deducted 7.5% of the basic salary.

Issues

  1. Whether the Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal (RBAT) decision to calculate pension on consolidated salary is valid.
  2. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the RBAT decision.

Reasoning

The court found that the RBAT failed to consider relevant matters and the basis for calculating the pension was the basic salary, which could not be varied except by an amendment to the Trust Deed. The court also held that the High Court does not have jurisdiction to review the RBAT decision.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, and the petition is dismissed.

Orders

  • Order of certiorari to remove the decision of the RBAT purporting to direct that the retirement benefits be calculated on consolidated salaries.
  • Order of mandamus compelling the RBAT to review the decision made on 23rd February 2012 in light of the interests of the pensioners.

Remedies

  • Dismissal of the petition.
  • Costs of the appeal and the dismissed petition are awarded to the appellants.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Retirement Benefits Act, Cap 197
  • Trust Deed
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case