SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

George Omondi & 210 others v Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal & 2 others [2020] KECA 666 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 666 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
666
Citation
[2020] KECA 666 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Employment and Labour Relations Court's dismissal of the appellants' appeal against the Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal's decision.CoramD.K. Maraga, S. Gatembu Kairu, K. M'Inoti
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal and upholds the Employment and Labour Relations Court's decision that the ELRC has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the RBA Appeals Tribunal.

Facts

The appellants are former Central Bank of Kenya employees who were members of the Central Bank of Kenya Pension Fund. They presented a claim to the Retirement Benefits Authority under Section 46 of the Retirement Benefits Authority Act, complaining about changes to the Trust Deed and Rules of the Pension Fund.

Issues

  1. Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal.
  2. Whether the Retirement Benefits Authority Act confers appellate jurisdiction on the High Court or the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal holds that the ELRC does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the RBA Appeals Tribunal, as the Retirement Benefits Authority Act does not expressly confer such appellate jurisdiction on the High Court or the ELRC.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Retirement Benefits Act, Cap. 197 of the Laws of Kenya
  • Retirement Benefits Authority Act, Act No. 3 of 1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case