SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Staff Pension Fund & Kenya Commercial Bank Staff Retirement (DC) Scheme 2006 & another v Ann Wangui Ngugi & 524 others [2018] KECA 710 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 710 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
710
Citation
[2018] KECA 710 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) dismissing a preliminary objectionCoramE. M. Githinji, H. M. Okwengu, J. Mohammed
Holding

The appeal is allowed, the Ruling of ELRC dismissing the preliminary objection is set aside insofar as it relates to the right of appeal. The preliminary objection on the right of appeal is allowed and the appeal is struck out.

Facts

The respondents are former employees of the Kenya Commercial Bank Limited. The bank established two pension schemes: a defined benefits scheme (1982 scheme) and a defined contribution scheme (2006 scheme). The respondents left service under different circumstances and are members of the 1982 scheme.

Issues

  1. Whether the court lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine any dispute relating to a retirement benefits or pension scheme
  2. Whether the respondents have a right of appeal to the ELRC

Reasoning

The court found that the respondents do not have a right of appeal to the ELRC and that the ELRC has no jurisdiction to determine the appeal. The court declines to determine the statutory jurisdiction of ELRC until the right occasion arises.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, the Ruling of ELRC dismissing the preliminary objection is set aside.

Orders

  • The preliminary objection on the right of appeal is allowed and the appeal is struck out.
  • No order for costs should be made against the respondents.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Retirement Benefits Act - No. 3 of 1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case