SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwavumbo Group Ranch v National Land Commission & 3 others [2019] KECA 842 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 842 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
842
Citation
[2019] KECA 842 (KLR)
Decided
7 March 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya Mombasa (Komingoi, J .) dated 29th November, 2017 ELC Petition (MSA) No. 94 of 2016CoramW. KARAN, P. O. KIAGE
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with orders that each party bears its own costs, as the respondents did not file any response to the appellant’s submissions nor did they attend Court for hearing.

Facts

The Government of Kenya planned to construct a Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) between Mombasa and Nairobi, requiring the acquisition of land along the railway path. The National Land Commission (NLC) initiated the compulsory acquisition process, but the Mwavumbo Group Ranch (appellant) was not compensated for the land it claimed to own.

Issues

  1. Compensation for land acquired by the National Land Commission
  2. Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court (ELC) to hear the petition

Reasoning

The court held that the issues raised were not constitutional and that the ELC had no original jurisdiction to hear the matter. The court also noted that the respondents did not file any response to the appellant's submissions.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Each party bears its own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Act 2012
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (5)
  • Methodist Church in Kenya Trustees Registered & Another v Jeremiah Muku & Another, CA APP. No 203 of 2008
  • Gabriel Mutava & 2 others v. The Managing Director Kenya Ports Authority & Another, Court of Appeal at Malindi, Civil Appeal no 67 of 2015
  • Samson Cheme Vuko v Nelson Kilumo & 2 others [2016] eKLR
  • Harrikssoon v Attorney General of Trinidad & Tobago (1980) AC 265
  • Trinidad Re Application by Bahadur [1986] LRC (Const.) 297
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case