SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Ndirangu Kariuki v Commission on Administrative Justice & another [2017] KECA 616 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 616 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
616
Citation
[2017] KECA 616 (KLR)
Decided
31 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the High Court's ruling and order striking out the constitutional petitionCoramMUSINGA, GATEMBU, MURGOR, Mumbi Ngugi
Holding

The constitutional petition is not a contravention of the mandatory provisions and the High Court has jurisdiction to determine the issues.

Facts

The appellant was declared as the duly elected member of the National Assembly for Embakasi Central Constituency, but the 1st respondent challenged his election based on convictions for abuse of office.

Issues

  1. Whether the constitutional petition contravenes mandatory provisions of the Constitution, Elections Act, 2011, and Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules 2013.
  2. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine the issues raised in the petition.

Reasoning

The court held that the constitutional petition does not violate mandatory provisions of the Constitution, Elections Act, and Rules, and that the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Elections Act, 2011
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules 2013
Cases cited (3)
  • Kituo Cha Sheria v John Ndirangu & Another [2013] eKLR
  • The Speaker of the National Assembly v The Hon. James Njenga Karume [2008] 1 KLR 425
  • Kones v Republic & Another ex parte Kimani Wanyoike & Others, [2008] 3 KLR EP 29
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case