SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Harun Mwau v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 4 others [2017] KEHC 9453 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 9453 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9453
Citation
[2017] KEHC 9453 (KLR)
Decided
25 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for DeclarationPostureRespondents and interested parties raise a preliminary objection to the court's jurisdiction.CoramLaw, Lenaola, Mativo, Nyarangi
Holding

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition.

Facts

The petitioner seeks a declaration that the nullification of the president elect's election by the Supreme Court means a new presidential election is required. He also seeks to have election notices declared null and void due to a lack of valid nominations.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition regarding the presidential election.
  2. Whether the nullification of the president elect's election by the Supreme Court necessitates a new presidential election.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition, as it does not touch on the presidential election process, which is a matter for the Supreme Court. The court cited constitutional provisions and judicial precedents to support its decision.

Outcome

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition.

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Article 140 of the Constitution
  • Article 137 of the Constitution
  • Article 138 of the Constitution
  • Article 88(4) of the Constitution
  • Section 14 of the Elections Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
  • Owners and Masters of Motor vessel “Joey” v Owners and Masters Motor Tugs “Barbara” and Steve “B”
  • Re The Matter of Interim Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case