SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Minister for Roads & Public Works & another Ex-Parte Kyevaluki Services Limited [2018] KECA 173 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 173 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
173
Citation
[2018] KECA 173 (KLR)
Decided
9 November 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment of the High Court of KenyaCoramP. N. WAKI, R. N. NAMBUYE, ASIKE MAKHANDIA
Holding

The High Court's decision is set aside, and the 1st and 2nd respondents are ordered to apply the chassis load capacities specified by manufacturers and adopt the gross vehicle weight in assessing load limits.

Facts

The 2nd respondent (Kenya National Highway Authority) directed the appellant (Kyevaluki Services Limited) to remove its motor vehicles from the road due to excess load capacities at various weigh bridges. The appellant was aggrieved and applied for Judicial Review.

Issues

  1. The method employed by the 1st and 2nd respondents to determine the load capacity for cargo motor vehicles was inconsistent and arbitrary.
  2. The method was also found to be erroneous and in breach of statutory requirements.

Reasoning

The Court found that the method used by the respondents was inconsistent and arbitrary, and thus violated statutory requirements.

Outcome

Appeal Successful

Orders

  • Order of certiorari to quash the entire decision by the 1st and 2nd respondents.
  • Order of mandamus compelling and directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to apply the chassis load capacities specified by manufacturers and adopt the gross vehicle weight in assessing load limits.
  • Order of prohibition prohibiting the 1st and 2nd respondents from adopting the sole use of the load capacity determined by an inspector.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Traffic Act Cap 403, Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case