SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwanje v ICS Technical College & another (Application 154 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 32 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (13 January 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEHC 32 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
32
Citation
[2025] KEHC 32 (KLR)
Decided
13 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Certiorari and MandamusCoramJ NGAAH
Holding

The court quashed the decision of the 1st respondent and ordered the issuance of the applicant's Exam Card and Index Number.

Facts

The applicant, a first-year student at ICS Technical College, registered for KNEC Diploma in Secretarial Studies exams scheduled for July 2024. On July 6, 2024, the college informed students to submit their business plans and collect their examination cards and Index Numbers on July 8, 2024. The applicant did not receive her card and was barred from sitting the exams.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's exclusion from the KNEC Diploma in Secretarial Studies exams is lawful
  2. Whether the 1st respondent has the authority to bar the applicant from sitting the exams

Reasoning

The court found that the 1st respondent's decision was arbitrary and unlawful, and did not comply with the statutory requirements.

Outcome

The applicant's application is granted.

Orders

  • Quashing the decision of the 1st respondent to bar the applicant from sitting the KNEC Diploma in Secretarial Studies exams
  • Compelling the 1st respondent to issue the applicant with an Exam Card and Index Number
  • Compelling the 2nd respondent to issue the KNEC Exams

Remedies

  • Quashing the decision
  • Compelling issuance of Exam Card and Index Number
  • Compelling issuance of KNEC Exams

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law Reform Act, Cap. 26
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case