SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kaplamai Land Control Board & another; Gichuhi & 2 others (Ex parte Applicants) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E005 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7236 (KLR) (22 October 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 7236 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
7236
Citation
[2025] KEELC 7236 (KLR)
Decided
22 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Remove into Court and Quash DecisionCoramCK NZILI
Holding

The ex parte applicants' application is granted, and the decision of the Kaplamai Land Control Board is invalidated. The ex parte applicants are directed to lodge their application for a land control board consent afresh within 2 weeks.

Facts

The ex parte applicants are residents of Nyakinyua Mugumo Tree Farm. They claim that the 1st respondent, Kaplamai Land Control Board, rejected their land control board application seeking consent for the amalgamation of some plots, contrary to a consent order obtained in Kitale ELC No. 103 of 2015.

Issues

  1. Fair hearing
  2. Natural justice
  3. Abuse of discretion
  4. Statutory duty to give written decision

Reasoning

The court found that the 1st respondent did not act within the law, did not comply with the constitutional and statutory legal framework, and failed to give written reasons for the decision.

Outcome

Invalidation of the decision

Orders

  • Ex parte applicants are directed to lodge their application for a land control board consent afresh within 2 weeks

Remedies

  • Invalidation of the decision
  • Ex parte applicants are directed to lodge their application for a land control board consent afresh within 2 weeks

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Control Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic -vs- Kiambu Land Control Board Ex parte Burnaby Properties Ltd
  • Agricultural Finance Corporation -vs- Land Control Board of Loitokitok & 3 others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case