SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Richard Mwaura Njuguna & another v Republic [2019] KECA 1022 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 1022 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1022
Citation
[2019] KECA 1022 (KLR)
Decided
8 February 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ochieng & Achode, JJ.)CoramALNASHIR VISRAM, W. KARANJA, M. K. KOOME
Holding

We set aside the sentence of life imprisonment and substitute it with a 10-year imprisonment from the date of conviction.

Facts

On January 4, 2007, Paul Sonko was driving when he was robbed by two armed men who demanded money and a mobile phone. The robbers fled, and Paul reported the incident. The police recovered a Samsung 710N phone and arrested the 1st appellant, Richard Mwaura Njuguna, and a young lady, Grace Muthoni Wanjiru.

Issues

  1. Whether the sentence of life imprisonment imposed by the trial court was appropriate.
  2. Whether the sentence of imprisonment in a borstal institution for 3 years was appropriate.

Reasoning

The court found the sentence inappropriate due to the gravity of the offense and the appellant's age, and substituted it with a 10-year imprisonment.

Outcome

The appeal is partly successful.

Orders

  • To set aside the sentence of life imprisonment and substitute it with a 10-year imprisonment from the date of conviction.
  • To direct the appellant to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Children Act
  • Borstal Institutions Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Ahamad Abolfathi Mohamed & Another vs. R [2018] eKLR
  • R vs. Dennis Kirui Cheruiyot [2014] eKLR
  • JKK vs. R [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case