SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Commissioner of Customs and Excise v Export Trading Company Limited [2019] KECA 1039 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 1039 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1039
Citation
[2019] KECA 1039 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCustoms Duty DisputePostureApplication for stay of execution of judgment and orders of the High CourtCoramJUDGE OF APPEAL, M. WARSAME, JUDGE OF APPEAL, D. K. MUSINGA, JUDGE OF APPEAL, J. OTIENO-ODEK
Holding

The application for stay of execution of the High Court's judgment and orders is allowed. The stay is granted pending hearing and determination of an intended appeal.

Facts

The respondent, Export Trading Company Limited, imported coconut coir pith into Kenya and the applicant, The Commissioner of Customs and Excise, classified it under Customs & Excise Heading 1404 Tariff No. 1404.900.00, attracting 10% customs duty. The respondent appealed, and the High Court quashed the decision, directing coconut coir pith to be classified under Heading 53.05.

Issues

  1. Classification of coconut coir pith under Customs & Excise Heading 1404 Tariff No. 1404.900.00
  2. Whether the High Court's decision should be stayed pending an intended appeal

Reasoning

The court finds merit in the application, noting the intended appeal is arguable and may render the High Court's decision nugatory if not stayed.

Outcome

Stay of execution of the High Court's judgment and orders granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and order of the High Court pending hearing and determination of an intended appeal
  • The applicant to file the Record of Appeal within 60 days of the date hereof
  • Each party to bear its costs in this application
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case