SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Njuguna Gachie v Alice Kemunto Ondieki & another [2019] KECA 173 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 173 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
173
Citation
[2019] KECA 173 (KLR)
Decided
8 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution, stay of proceedings and temporary injunctionCoramD.K. MUSINGA, S. GATEMBU KAIRU, J. OTIENO ODEK
Holding

The orders issued on 17th October, 2014 shall stand vacated and the appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this judgment.

Facts

The applicant, Peter Njuguna Gachie, filed a suit against the respondents, Alice Kemunto Ondieki and Kennedy Obwaya Onsongo, for encroachment upon his parcel of land. The respondents filed a notice of appeal to the Court, which included an application for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the applicant from interfering with their property. The criminal case against the applicant was withdrawn by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Issues

  1. Whether the orders issued on 17th October, 2014 should be vacated
  2. Whether the respondents have acted diligently in pursuing their appeal

Reasoning

The court found that the respondents have not acted diligently in pursuing their appeal and that the trial court's file is missing. The court decided to afford the respondents a limited period of time to file their appeal.

Outcome

The orders issued on 17th October, 2014 shall stand vacated and the appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this judgment.

Orders

  • The orders issued on 17th October, 2014 shall stand vacated
  • The appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this judgment

Remedies

  • Afford the respondents a limited period of time to file their appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Article 47 of the Constitution
  • Fair administrative Action Act, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case