SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ibrahim Otieno Ngonga & 2 others v Republic [2019] KECA 287 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 287 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
287
Citation
[2019] KECA 287 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal against the dismissal of the appellants' appeal against conviction and sentenceCoramE. M. Githinji, Hannah Okwengu, J. Mohammed
Holding

The appeals against conviction are dismissed. The appeals against sentence are allowed, and the death penalty is set aside. A term of fifteen (15) years imprisonment is substituted, effective from 30th November, 2004.

Facts

The appellants were convicted and sentenced to death for robbery with violence, and appealed to the High Court, which dismissed the appeals. The appellants then appealed to the Court of Appeal, abandoning their appeal against conviction and only pursuing the appeal against sentence.

Issues

  1. The mandatory nature of the death sentence under section 204 of the Penal Code is unconstitutional.
  2. The trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances and exercise discretion in sentencing the appellants.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the mandatory nature of the death sentence under section 204 of the Penal Code is unconstitutional, as it deprives the court of discretion. The trial court did not consider mitigating circumstances and failed to exercise discretion.

Outcome

The appeals against sentence are allowed, and the death penalty is set aside.

Orders

  • Set aside the death penalty and substitute a term of fifteen (15) years imprisonment

Remedies

  • Substitute a term of fifteen (15) years imprisonment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Penal Code
Cases cited (2)
  • Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR
  • William Okungu Kittiny Kisumu Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case