SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis Osike Masaba & another v Henry Khakhubi Wedodo [2019] KECA 417 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 417 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
417
Citation
[2019] KECA 417 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the dismissal of an application to set aside an order of the High CourtCoramASIKE-MAKHANDIA, P. O. KIAGE, OTIENO-ODEK
Holding

The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants were not ready to prosecute their appeals and that the order for consolidation did not impact negatively on their preparedness.

Facts

The appellants filed two appeals challenging a judgment in Busia PMCC No. 154 of 2004, which ordered lifting of cautions on land parcel number Bukhayo/Kisoko/348. The appeals were consolidated, but the appellants were dismissed for lack of prosecution. They then filed an application to set aside the dismissal order.

Issues

  1. whether the High Court was partial in its judgment
  2. whether the order of consolidation was made without jurisdiction
  3. whether the appellants had not sought for adjournment
  4. whether the appellants were denied a hearing
  5. whether the caution was lodged without any cause
  6. whether interested parties had a case claiming a share of the suit land
  7. whether the respondent held the suit land in trust for the appellants for over 20 years
  8. whether findings in succession cause No. 120 of 2014 and tribunal case No. 14 of 2007 were considered

Reasoning

The Court considered the appellants' submissions and found that they were not candid with the court. The Court also noted that the caution was lifted only on the suit land and not about interests and privileges on the land, thus not causing prejudice to the appellants.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case