SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Langata Development Co. Limited v Mary Wanjiru Dames [2019] KECA 494 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 494 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
494
Citation
[2019] KECA 494 (KLR)
Decided
19 July 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for certification and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and application for stay and preservation of the suit propertyCoramJUDGE OF APPEAL, KARAN, KOOME, ODEK, W. KARAN
Holding

The court finds that no Notice of Appeal has been filed either at the Supreme Court or Court of Appeal, and therefore, it has no jurisdiction to entertain the instant application for leave and certification to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Facts

The respondent, Mary Wanjiru Dames, was the registered proprietor of land parcel I.R. 57550 - LR 7540/23. The applicant, Langata Development Co. Limited, agreed to purchase 672 acres of the land, but the surveyors gave the applicant 757.3 acres, including an extra 85.3 acres. The respondent sought an order for re-transfer of the excess land.

Issues

  1. Whether a valid Notice of Appeal has been filed in relation to the matter
  2. Whether the applicant is entitled to certification and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court
  3. Whether the applicant is entitled to preservation orders

Reasoning

The court notes that a Notice of Appeal must be filed outright and is a jurisdictional pre-requisite. The absence of a Notice of Appeal means the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the application for certification and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Outcome

The court downed its tools and dismissed the application for certification and leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat -v- Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others [2014] eKLR
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission -v- Jane Cheperenger & 2 Others [2015] eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” -v- Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd [1989] KLR 1
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case