Martin Tindi Khaemba v Law Society of Kenya & 2 others [2019] KECA 503 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 503
- Citation
- [2019] KECA 503 (KLR)
- Decided
- 11 July 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a High Court rulingCoramALNASHIR VISRAM, S. GATEMBU KAIRU, A. K. MURGOR
Holding
The High Court's ruling that the appellant's Judicial Review application was premature is upheld.
Facts
The appellant, an advocate, filed a Judicial Review application to prohibit proceedings in Disciplinary Cause No. 155 of 2015 against him scheduled for hearing on Monday 18th April 2016 before the Advocates Disciplinary Tribunal.
Issues
- Whether the appellant's Judicial Review application was premature.
- Whether the Advocates Disciplinary Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and set aside the charging order and Certificate of Taxation.
Reasoning
The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that proceeding to trial would be unfair, unjust, or a breach of his right to a fair hearing.
Outcome
Affirmed
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…