SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Vincent Chemjor & another v Republic [2019] KECA 517 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 517 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
517
Citation
[2019] KECA 517 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from conviction and sentenceCoramE. M. Githinji, H. M. Okwengu, J. Mohammed
Holding

The appeal by the 1st appellant, Vincent Chemjor, is dismissed with the 1st appellant suffering death in the first count and sentences of death in the 2nd and 3rd counts held in abeyance. The appeal by the 2nd appellant, Peter Kiprop Chemjor, is allowed, with the conviction in each of the three counts quashed and sentences set aside.

Facts

On 23rd November 2007, Vincent Chemjor and Peter Kiprop Chemjor allegedly killed three people, Harun Kimotol, Francis Kandie, and Charles Chepkitony, during a fight.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in convicting and sentencing the appellants to death
  2. Whether the trial court erred in not imposing a sentence of death in one count and leaving the sentences in the other two counts in abeyance
  3. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the crime was most foul and imposing the death penalty

Reasoning

The court found that the trial court erred in imposing the death penalty in all three counts, and that the crime was not most foul as found by the trial court.

Outcome

Appeal allowed in part, conviction and sentence quashed for the 2nd appellant, and death penalty held in abeyance for the 1st appellant.

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence of death for the 1st appellant in the first count is dismissed
  • Conviction and sentence of death for the 1st appellant in the 2nd and 3rd counts are held in abeyance
  • Conviction and sentence for the 2nd appellant in all three counts are quashed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Francis Karioko Muruatetu and others v Republic [2017] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case