SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Karuri Civil Engineering (K) Limited v Equity Bank Limited [2019] KECA 866 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 866 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
866
Citation
[2019] KECA 866 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Havelock J.) dated 16 th October 2012CoramW. OUKO, F. SICHALE, J. OTIENO-ODEK
Holding

We find this appeal has no merit and dismiss it. The respondent is not liable to the appellant for loss of user of the detained equipment on account of delay in payment of the performance bond.

Facts

The appellant, Karuri Civil Engineering (K) Limited, filed a suit against the respondent Bank, Equity Bank Limited, for breach of a Performance Bond. The appellant claims it performed a substantial part of the sewerage works until 13 th July 2004 when the Office of the President terminated the contract and demanded payment of the Bond amount. The respondent Bank paid the Bond sum on 23 rd September 2008, but the appellant's machinery and equipment were detained for four years.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent Bank committed breach of the Performance Bond
  2. Whether the respondent Bank is liable to the appellant for loss of user of the detained equipment

Reasoning

The retention or detention of the appellant's plant, machinery, equipment and motor vehicles was occasioned by failure of the appellant to execute and perform the sewerage rehabilitation works. The bond only guaranteed payment to the Department of Defence and was not an insurance cover for the appellant.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Counterclaim affirmed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Sinohydro Corporation Limited vs. GC Retail Limited & another [2016] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case