SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jubilee Insurance Company Limited v Kishor Ramji Hirani & 2 others [2019] KECA 888 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 888 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
888
Citation
[2019] KECA 888 (KLR)
Decided
22 February 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Khaminwa J.)CoramP. N. Waki, S. G. Gatebvu Kairu, J. Otieno-Odek
Holding

The appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court is set aside. The suit is remitted for retrial by any judge of the High Court.

Facts

The 1st and 2nd respondents applied for a loan of Ksh. 6 million from the appellant Jubilee Insurance Company Limited. The loan was secured by a charge on the suit property. The respondents received Ksh. 4 million, but the balance of Ksh. 2 million was not released. The respondents claimed breach of contract and sought to discharge the charge and release the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant is entitled to enforce the terms of the charge instrument.
  2. Whether the respondents owe the appellant the sum of Ksh. 5.8 million and interest.
  3. Whether the respondents are entitled to a detailed statement of account and general damages for breach of contract.

Reasoning

The trial court erred in failing to consider the sums of Ksh. 4 million and Ksh. 1,197,496.45 as part of the respondents' liability. The court did not determine the interest rate on the sum of Ksh. 5.8 million held by the appellant as deposit.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of the High Court set aside
  • Remitted for retrial by any judge of the High Court
  • Order for the sum of Ksh. 5.8 million held by the appellant to continue being held on the same terms and conditions until further orders by the High Court at rehearing of the suit

Remedies

  • Remitted for retrial by any judge of the High Court
  • Order for the sum of Ksh. 5.8 million held by the appellant to continue being held on the same terms and conditions until further orders by the High Court at rehearing of the suit
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case