SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rose Wakuthi Mwangi Njunu (suing as administrator of the Estate for the late Julius W Mwangi Njunu) v Edward Kithinji & 2 others [2019] KECA 929 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 929 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
929
Citation
[2019] KECA 929 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Milimani Commercial Court, NairobiCoramASIKE MAKHANDIA, S. GATEMBU KAIRU, A. K. MURGOR
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the widow had not proven her case to the required standard of proof for fraud.

Facts

The deceased, Julius W. Mwangi Njunu, sold his property to the 1st respondent, Edward Kithinji, and the 2nd respondent, Housing Finance Company of Kenya, registered a legal charge over the property. The widow, Rose Wakuthi Mwangi Njunu, alleged fraud and sought nullification of the sale and transfer of the property.

Issues

  1. Whether the widow had failed to prove her case to the required standard regarding the sale and transfer of the property being fraudulent.
  2. Whether the evidence presented by the widow was sufficient to support her claim of fraud.

Reasoning

The Court considered the evidence presented and found that the widow's allegations of fraud were not supported by sufficient evidence to meet the high standard required.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Vinesh Emporium Gudka vs Keshavji Jivraj Dodhia
  • RG Patel v Lalji Makanji
  • Denis Noel Mukhulo Ochwada & another vs Elizabeth Murungari Njoroge & another
  • Nancy Kahoya Amadiva vs Expert Credit Ltd & another
  • Central Bank of Kenya Limited v Trust Bank Limited & 4 Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case