SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bata Brands SA & another v Umoja Rubber Products [2019] KECA 975 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 975 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
975
Citation
[2019] KECA 975 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for injunction pending appealCoramR. N. Nambuye
Holding

The application for an injunction pending appeal is certified as urgent.

Facts

Bata Brands SA and Bata Shoe Company (Kenya) Limited filed an application for an injunction pending appeal against the High Court's decision dismissing their application for an injunction. The High Court found that Umoja Rubber Products was passing off its 'Shupavu' branded shoes as those of Bata's 'Toughees' branded shoes.

Issues

  1. Whether the application for an injunction pending appeal should be certified as urgent
  2. Whether the High Court's decision to dismiss the application for an injunction was justified

Reasoning

The Court found that the High Court upheld the applicant's contention that the respondent was passing off its 'Shupavu' branded shoes as those of the applicant's 'Toughees' branded shoes, but failed to grant a restraining order. The Court was satisfied that sufficient basis was made out to recall and interfere with the order declining to certify the application as urgent.

Outcome

The order declining to certify the application as urgent is set aside and substituted with an order certifying the application as urgent.

Orders

  • The application for an injunction pending appeal is certified as urgent.

Remedies

  • To protect the applicant's good will as recognized by the trial court.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case