SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd v Eunice Nkirote Ringera [2020] KECA 54 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 54 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
54
Citation
[2020] KECA 54 (KLR)
Decided
18 December 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution of judgmentCoramR. Nambuye, W. Karanja, A. Sikheh Makhandia
Holding

Application for stay of execution of judgment is allowed on condition that the applicant shall deposit half of the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the names of advocates for the parties within the next 30 days from the date of this ruling.

Facts

Respondent Eunice Nkirote Ringera sued Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd for trespassing on her property and obtained a judgment awarding her Kshs. 14,000,000 in compensatory damages. Applicant appealed part of the judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the appeal will be rendered nugatory if the impugned judgment and decree are not stayed

Reasoning

The court considered the applicant's memorandum of appeal and noted that the award of damages was well deserved. The court found that the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal which will be rendered nugatory if the judgment is not stayed.

Outcome

Application allowed

Orders

  • Deposit half of the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the names of advocates for the parties within the next 30 days from the date of this ruling

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of judgment

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Reliance Bank Limited v Norlake Investments Ltd (2002) 1 EA 227
  • Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the Goldenberg Affair & 3 Others v Jacob Kilach (2003) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case